Americans just cannot get enough of football on television.
According to a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today entitled “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” author Brent Schrotenboer states, “Even though ticket demand is relatively low for lesser bowls, countless viewers keep watching, even when oahu is the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a casino game that drew just 20,256 fans the other day but attracted the average television audience of 1,114,000, according to ESPN.”
Schrotenboer continues to express, “Only one bowl game this past year drew fewer than 1.2 million viewers an average of, according to Nielsen. That’s better compared to the 1.1 million who watched a beginning day baseball game this past year involving the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Nationally broadcast regular season baseball games in 2012 and 2013 averaged about 680,000 viewers.”
Could you imagine then a following scenario for the college football bowl season:
ESPN builds its television studio strictly for the objective of hosting college bowl games. The tv network already owns and operates 11 bowl games. In that way, it doesn’t have middleman to manage for these additional events, eliminating needing to negotiate with another facility to host the game. No costs for having to operate a vehicle production trailers or fly technical crews halfway over the country.
Because this facility would be built as a television studio and not as an outdoor multipurpose arena, ESPN may make attending the bowl game a true multimedia experience for the fan, with special effects like lasers. lights and smoke. The network could ensure the bowl experience for the live attendee as well as the tv viewer to be unlike any other.
But here’s the catch: the ESPN studio might have just a limited number of seats, say 5,000 or less, which may minimize construction costs. The studio would not need to be much larger than the average college football program’s practice facility. Just big enough to exhibit to the million plus viewers there are actually some fans in the stands ดูบอลสด.Thus, there wouldn’t be described as a single bad seat in the house. You’d be assured an up-close and personal bowl experience. And due to the intimate atmosphere, the sounds from the fans would reverberate through the facility.
Due to the limited way to obtain seats, this might force ticket demand (and prices) up. Forget about 60,000- or 80,000-seat facilities that are less than a quarter full. It would be a 180-degree change from the present experience, where many schools need to count on daily deal sites to help unload their share of allocated tickets.
Thus, the universities would benefit because they wouldn’t be forced to purchase the 1000s of tickets they cannot sell (even on Groupon).
ESPN could make use of this facility multiple times through the expanse of the two- to three-week bowl period.
As an example, this season five additional college football teams qualified for a pan that they were not invited to. That’s two additional games that the schools and network aren’t generating countless dollars from, forcing television viewers to instead watch sitcom reruns when they would much rather be enjoying a live sporting event. And advertisers prefer to be buying time on a television program that most viewers will watch live and can’t fast-forward through their commercials.
Schrotenboer states, “Schools, coaches and players also want it – likely to a pan game means more possible donations, more television exposure, more practice time and more bonus money.”